The Trump administration's approach to the White House website sparked considerable debate, particularly regarding its documentation. A key focus was the deliberate removal or archiving of certain pages and reports related to climate change, LGBTQ+ rights, and other policy areas. This raised concerns about transparency and accessibility of information.
Analyzing this "digital dust" involves examining archived versions of the website (using tools like the Wayback Machine) to understand what information was altered, removed, or downplayed. It's also about understanding the rationale behind these changes – were they purely cosmetic, reflecting policy shifts, or something more deliberate? The documentation, or lack thereof surrounding these website changes, offers a unique glimpse into the priorities and communication strategies of the administration. Examining this digital footprint provides valuable insights for researchers, journalists, and anyone seeking to understand the evolving landscape of presidential communication in the digital age.
